Home Page LDS Series Christian Articles JW Articles Catholic Answers SDA Contact Comments
(From the on-line Wikipedia page)
The Three Witnesses were a group of
three early leaders of the Latter Day Saints movement who signed a statement in
1830 saying that an angel had shown them the golden plates from which Joseph
Smith Jr. translated the Book of Mormon and that they had heard God's voice
testifying that the book had been translated by the power of God. The Three are
among the eleven Book of Mormon witnesses, of whom the remainder were the Eight
Witnesses who affirmed that they "saw and handled" the plates.
The Three Witnesses were Oliver Cowdery, Martin Harris, and David Whitmer, whose
joint testimony, in conjunction with a separate statement by Eight Witnesses,
has been printed with nearly every edition of the Book of Mormon since its first
publication in 1830. All three witnesses eventually broke with Smith and were
excommunicated from the church he had founded. Harris and Cowdery eventually
rejoined the church, and to varying degrees, all three continued to testify to
the divine origin of the Book of Mormon.[1]
Testimony of the Three Witnesses
Probably in early July 1829—but on an unspecified day and in an unspecified
place—Joseph Smith Jr., Oliver Cowdery, David Whitmer, and Martin Harris are
said to have retired to the woods, praying to receive a vision of the Golden
Plates. After some time, Harris left the other three men, believing his presence
had prevented the vision from occurring. The remaining three again knelt and
soon saw a light in the air over their heads and an angel holding the plates in
his hands. Smith retrieved Harris, and after praying at some length with him,
Harris too said he saw the vision, shouting, "'Tis enough; 'tis enough; mine
eyes have beheld, Hosanna!"[2]
An 1830 statement titled "Testimony of Three Witnesses"—one statement signed by
three men rather than three separate statements—was published at the end of the
first edition of the Book of Mormon:
Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work
shall come: That we, through the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus
Christ, have seen the plates which contain this record, which is a record of the
people of Nephi, and also of the Lamanites, his brethren, and also of the people
of Jared, who came from the tower of which hath been spoken. And we also know
that they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice hath
declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the work is true. And we
also testify that we have seeen [sic] the engravings which are upon the plates;
and they have been shewn unto us by the power of God, and not of man. And we
declare with words of soberness, that an angel of God came down from heaven, and
he brought and laid before our eyes, that we beheld and saw the plates, and the
engravings thereon; and we know that it is by the grace of God the Father, and
our Lord Jesus Christ, that we beheld and bear record that these things are
true. And it is marvellous [sic] in our eyes. Nevertheless, the voice of the
Lord commanded us that we should bear record of it; wherefore, to be obedient
unto the commandments of God, we bear testimony of these things. And we know
that if we are faithful in Christ, we shall rid our garments of the blood of all
men, and be found spotless before the judgment-seat of Christ, and shall dwell
with him eternally in the heavens. And the honor be to the Father, and to the
Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God. Amen.
In subsequent editions of the Book of Mormon, the testimony was moved to the
beginning of the book and its spelling standardized.
As a group, the Three Witnesses served only one other role in the church before
they were excommunicated in 1837-38. After Joseph Smith had selected the council
of the Twelve Apostles from among the veterans of Zion’s Camp, the Three
Witnesses "called out the twelve men and gave each one a blessing."[3]
The Three Witnesses
Without doubt the Three Witnesses were closely associated with Joseph Smith, and
Martin Harris also made a significant financial contribution to the movement.[4]
In addition, some modern interpreters of Mormonism have argued (as did some
contemporaries) that the Witnesses had a similar magical worldview. One of
these, Grant Palmer, a former director of LDS Institutes of Religion who was
disfellowshipped by the LDS Church in 2004 after writing
An Insider’s View of Mormon Origins, argued that moderns "tend to
read into [the Witnesses'] testimonies a rationalist perspective rather than a
nineteenth-century magical mindset....They shared a common world view, and this
is what drew them together in 1829."[5]
Oliver Cowdery
Oliver Cowdery was a school teacher and an early convert to Mormonism who served
as scribe while Joseph Smith dictated what he said was a translation of the Book
of Mormon. Like Smith, who was a distant relative, Cowdery was also a treasure
hunter who had used a divining rod in his youth. Cowdery asked questions of the
rod; if it moved, the answer was yes, if not, no.[6]
Cowdery also told Smith that he had seen the Golden Plates in a vision before
the two ever met.[7]
Before Cowdery served as one of the Three Witnesses, he had already experienced
two other important visions. Cowdery said that he and Smith had received the
Aaronic Priesthood from John the Baptist in May 1829 after which they had
baptized each other in the Susquehanna River.[8]
Cowdery said that he and Smith had later gone into the forest and prayed "until
a glorious light encircled us, and as we arose on account of the light, three
persons stood before us dressed in white, their faces beaming with glory." One
of the three announced that he was the Apostle Peter and named the others as the
Apostles James and John.[9]
By 1838, Cowdery and Smith had engaged in a number of disagreements that
included doctrinal differences about the role of faith and works,[10]
the Kirtland Safety Society[11],
and what Cowdery called Smith's "dirty, nasty, filthy affair" with Fanny Alger.[12]
Smith's growing reliance on Sidney Rigdon as his first counselor,[13]
differences over the management of finances during the gathering of the
Latter-day Saints in Jackson County and Kirtland[14]
ultimately led to Cowdery's excommunication in April.[15]
Cowdery also refused to obey a high council decision not to sell lands on which
he hoped to make a profit, "[D]eclaring that he would not be governed by any
ecclesiastical authority nor Revelation whatever in his temporal affairs."[16]
After Cowdery's excommunication on April 12, 1838, he taught school, practiced
law, and became involved in Ohio political affairs. Until 1848, Cowdery put the
Latter Day Saint church behind him. He joined the Methodist church in Tiffin,
Ohio, and, according to a lay leader of that church, publicly declared that he
was "ashamed of his connection with Mormonism."[17]
Later Cowdery reaffirmed his role in the
establishment of Mormonism even though that confession cost him the editorship
of a newspaper. In 1848, after Joseph Smith's assassination, Cowdery reaffirmed
his witness to the Golden Plates and asked to be readmitted to the church. He
never held another high office in the church, in part because he died sixteen
months after his rebaptism.[18]
Martin Harris
Martin Harris was a respected farmer in the Palmyra area who had changed his
religion at least five times before he became a Mormon.[19]
A biographer wrote that his "imagination
was excitable and fecund." One letter says that Harris thought that a candle
sputtering was the work of the devil[20]
and that he had met Jesus in the shape of a deer and walked and talked with him
for two or three miles.[21]
The local Presbyterian minister called
him "a visionary fanatic."[22]
A friend, who praised Harris as
"universally esteemed as an honest man" but disagreed with his religious
affiliation, declared that Harris' mind "was overbalanced by 'marvellousness'"
and that his belief in earthly visitations of angels and ghosts gave him the
local reputation of being crazy.[23]
Another friend said, "Martin was a good
citizen. Martin was a man that would do just as he agreed with you. But, he was
a great man for seeing spooks."[24]
During the early years, Harris "seems to have repeatedly admitted the internal,
subjective nature of his visionary experience."[25]
The foreman in the Palmyra printing
office that produced the first Book of Mormon said that Harris "used to practice
a good deal of his characteristic jargon and 'seeing with the spiritual eye,'
and the like."[26]
John H. Gilbert, the typesetter for most
of the book, said that he had asked Harris, "Martin, did you see those plates
with your naked eyes?" According to Gilbert, Harris "looked down for an instant,
raised his eyes up, and said, 'No, I saw them with a spiritual eye."[27]
Two other Palmyra residents said that
Harris told them that he had seen the plates with "the eye of faith" or
"spiritual eyes."[28]
In 1838, Harris is said to have told an
Ohio congregation that "he never saw the plates with his natural eyes, only in
vision or imagination."[29]
A neighbor of Harris in Kirtland, Ohio,
said that Harris "never claimed to have seen [the plates] with his natural eyes,
only spiritual vision."[30]
One account states that in March 1838, Martin Harris publicly denied that either
he or the other Witnesses to the Book of Mormon had literally seen the golden
plates—although, of course, he had not been present when Whitmer and Cowdery
first claimed to have viewed them. This account says that Harris's recantation,
made during a period of crisis in early Mormonism, induced five influential
members, including three Apostles, to leave the Church.[31]
Later in life, Harris strongly denied
that he ever made this statement.[32]
In 1837, Harris joined dissenters, led by Warren Parrish, in an attempt to
reform the church. But Parrish rejected the Book of Mormon, and Harris continued
to believe in it. By 1840, Harris had returned to Smith's church. Following
Smith's assassination, Harris accepted James J. Strang as a new prophet, and
Strang also claimed to have been divinely led to an ancient record engraved upon
metal plates. By 1847, Harris had broken with Strang and had accepted the
leadership of fellow Book of Mormon witness, David Whitmer. Harris then left
Whitmer for another Mormon factional leader, Gladden Bishop. In 1855, Harris
joined with the last surviving brother of Joseph Smith Jr., William Smith, and
declared that William was Joseph's true successor. "In 1856 Harris's wife left
him to gather with the Mormons in Utah. Harris remained in Kirtland and, as
caretaker of the temple, gave tours to interested visitors.[33]
Despite his earlier statements regarding the spiritual nature of his experience,
in 1853, Harris told one David Dille that he had held the forty- to sixty-pound
plates on his knee for "an hour-and-a-half" and handled them "plate after
plate."[34]
Even later, Harris affirmed that he had
seen the plates and the angel with his natural eyes: "Gentlemen," holding out
his hand, "do you see that hand? Are you sure you see it? Or are your eyes
playing you a trick or something? No. Well, as sure as you see my hand so sure
did I see the Angel and the plates."[35]
In 1870, at the age of 87, Harris accepted an invitation to live in Utah, where
he was rebaptized and spent his remaining years with relatives in Catch County.
In his last years Harris continued to bear fervent testimony to the authenticity
of the plates, but a contemporary critic of the Church noted that Harris
rejected some important LDS doctrines and that his sympathy for the Utah church
was tenuous.[36]
In a letter of 1870, Harris swore, "[N]o man ever heard me in any way
deny the truth of the Book of Mormon, the administration of the angel that
showed me the plates, nor the organization of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints under the administration of Joseph Smith, Jun., the prophet
whom the Lord raised up for that purpose in these the latter days, that he may
show forth his power and glory."[37]
David Whitmer
David Whitmer first became involved with Joseph Smith and the Golden Plates
through his friend Oliver Cowdery; and because of his longevity, Whitmer became
the most interviewed of the Three Witnesses. Whitmer gave various versions of
his experience in viewing the Golden Plates. Although less credulous than
Harris, Whitmer had his own visionary predilections and owned a seer stone.[38]
In 1829, before testifying to the truth
of the Golden Plates, Whitmer reported that when traveling with Smith to his
father's farm in Fayette, New York, they had seen a Nephite on the road who
suddenly disappeared. Then when they arrived at his father's house, they were
"impressed" that the same Nephite was under the shed.[39]
Recounting the vision to Orson Pratt in 1878, Whitmer claimed to have seen not
only the Golden Plates but the "Brass Plates, the plates containing the record
of the wickedness of the people of the world....the sword of Laban, the
Directors (i.e. the ball which Lehi had) and the Interpreters. I saw them just
as plain as I see this bed...."[40]
On other occasions, Whitmer's vision of
the plates seemed far less corporeal. When asked in 1880 for a description of
the angel who showed him the plates, Whitmer replied that the angel "had no
appearance or shape." Asked by the interviewer how he then could bear testimony
that he had seen and heard an angel, Whitmer replied, "Have you never had
impressions?" To which the interviewer responded, "Then you had impressions as
the Quaker when the spirit moves, or as a good Methodist in giving a happy
experience, a feeling?" "Just so," replied Whitmer.[41]
A young Mormon lawyer, James Henry Moyle, who interviewed Whitmer in 1885, asked
if there was any possibility that Whitmer had been deceived. "His answer was
unequivocal....that he saw the plates and heard the angel with unmistakable
clearness." But Moyle went away "not fully satisfied....It was more spiritual
than I anticipated."[42]
In 1831, Whitmer moved with early Mormon believers to Kirtland, Ohio; and then
in 1832, he followed the church to Jackson County, Missouri, and was named
Smith's successor even though he had criticized Smith's more recent innovations.
By December 1837, a movement led by Warren Parrish plotted to overthrow Smith
and replace him with Whitmer. After the collapse of the Kirtland Bank,
confrontation grew between the dissenters and those loyal to Joseph Smith.
Whitmer, his brother John, Oliver Cowdery, and others were harassed by the
Danites, a secret group of Mormon vigilantes, and were warned to leave the
county. Whitmer was formally excommunicated on April 13, 1838 and never rejoined
the church.[43]
Whitmer then moved to Richmond, Missouri, where he ran a livery stable and
became a civic leader. After Smith's assassination, Whitmer, like Martin Harris,
briefly followed James Strang, who had his own set of supernatural metal plates.
Later Whitmer organized his own splinter group based on his authority as one of
the Three Witnesses and even later supported another group headed by his brother
John. In his pamphlet, "An Address to All Believers in Christ" (1887), Whitmer
reaffirmed his witness to the Golden Plates,[44]
but he also criticized what he viewed as the errors of Joseph Smith, including
his introduction of plural marriage. "If you believe my testimony to the Book of
Mormon, if you believe that God spake to us three witnesses by his own voice,"
wrote Whitmer,"then I tell you that in June, 1838, God spake to me again by his
own voice from the heavens, and told me to 'separate myself from among the
Latter Day Saints....'"
[45]
Nevertheless, Whitmer is regarded by
Mormons as an "enduring witness to the genuineness of the prophet Joseph Smith
and his message."
Importance
The example of the Three Witnesses has encouraged the practice within Latter Day
Saint churches of having members regularly bear their testimony to the truth of
the Mormon gospel based on personal spiritual experiences and impressions.[46]
References
[1] In 1838, Joseph Smith called Cowdery, Harris, and Whitmer "too mean to mention; and we had liked to have forgotten them." B.H. Roberts, ed. History of the Church (Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1905), 3: 232.
[2] Richard Lyman Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005), 78.
[3] Bushman, 255. The choices were announced at a meeting on 14 February 1835. History of the Church 2:186-187. According to Bushman the implication of the blessing was that the Twelve were to be the "core missionary force."
[4] Richard Bushman, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005), 80-82.
[5] Grant H. Palmer, An Insider's View of Mormon Origins (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2002), 175-76.
[6] Palmer, 179: "Oliver Cowdery came from a similar background. He was a treasure hunter and 'rodsman' before he met Joseph Smith in 1829. William Cowdery, his father, was associated with a treasure-seeking group in Vermont, and it is from them, one assumes that Oliver learned the art of working with a divining rod. Joseph told Oliver that he knew the 'rod of nature' Oliver used 'has told you many things.'" See Vogel EMD, 1: 599-621.
[7] Palmer, 179; Dean C. Jessee, ed., The Papers of Joseph Smith: Autobiographical and Historical Writings (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1989), I: 10.
[8] Messenger and Advocate (October 1834), 14-16; Bushman, 74-75.
[9] Charles M. Nielsen to Heber Grant, February 10, 1898, in Dan Vogel, ed., Early Mormon Documents (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1998), 2: 476.
[10] Cowdery and Smith
publicly argued about the wording of what is now Doctrine & Covenants
Section 20:37. The dispute arose partially in part because as Second
Elder in the Church of Christ, Cowdery had received parts of the
revelation and was part author of the D&C 20. (see Articles of the
Church of Christ). Cowdery's version of the revelation was worded
differently than the version that was prepared for publication in 1835.
Smith's version reads: "All those who humble themselves before God, and
desire to be baptized, and come forth with broken hearts and contrite
spirits, and witness before the church that they have truly repented of
all their sins, and are willing to take upon them the name of Jesus
Christ, having a determination to serve him to the end, and truly
manifest by their works that they have received of the Spirit of Christ
unto the remission of their sins, shall be received by baptism into his
church." Cowdery's version reads: "Now therefore whosoever repenteth &
humbleth himself before me & desireth to be baptized in my name shall ye
baptize them...if it so be that he repenteth & is baptized in my name
then shall ye receive him & shall minister unto him of my flesh & blood
but if he repenteth not he shall not be numbered among my people that he
may not destroy my people." The discussion of how works and faith are
intertwined in the repentance process proved to be a dividing factor
between Smith and Cowdery during the printing of the Book of
Commandments and later the Doctrine and Covenants. Bushman, 323, 347-48.
[11] See excommunication charges against Cowdery in History of the Church, 3: 16
[12] Brodie, 182. The Cowdery quotation is from a letter to his brother. "B.H. Roberts, New Witnesses for God, 2: 308-9; Encyclopedia of Mormonism "Book of Mormon Witnesses"; Oliver Cowdery and History of the Church, 3: 14-17
[13] Although Rigdon was Smith's counselor in the First Presidency, Cowdery was still an "associate president" or "assistant president" of the Church and had more authority than Rigdon. However, David Whitmer was President of the Church in Zion, and Smith led the First Presidency and was president of the Church outside of Zion. It is apparent that Cowdery had a difficult time with the rising influence of Rigdon, and authority of Whitmer. Encyclopedia of Mormonism, "Cowdery, Oliver"; D. Michael Quinn, BYU Studies, 16: 193
[14] Encyclopedia of Mormonism, "Cowdery, Oliver"
[15]
History of the Church 3:16, "Wednesday, April 11, [1838]--Elder Seymour
Brunson preferred the following charges against Oliver Cowdery, to the
High Council at Far West: To the Bishop and Council of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I prefer the following charges
against President Oliver Cowdery. "First--For persecuting the brethren
by urging on vexatious law suits against them, and thus distressing the
innocent. Second--For seeking to destroy the character of President
Joseph Smith, Jun., by falsely insinuating that he was guilty of
adultery. "Third--For treating the Church with contempt by not attending
meetings. "Fourth--For virtually denying the faith by declaring that he
would not be governed by any ecclesiastical authority or revelations
whatever, in his temporal affairs. "Fifth--For selling his lands in
Jackson county, contrary to the revelations. "Sixth--For writing and
sending an insulting letter to President Thomas B. Marsh, while the
latter was on the High Council, attending to the duties of his office as
President of the Council, and by insulting the High Council with the
contents of said letter. "Seventh--For leaving his calling to which God
had appointed him by revelation, for the sake of filthy lucre, and
turning to the practice of law. "Eighth--For disgracing the Church by
being connected in the bogus business, as common report says.
"Ninth--For dishonestly retaining notes after they had been paid; and
finally, for leaving and forsaking the cause of God, and returning to
the beggarly elements of the world, and neglecting his high and holy
calling, according to his profession."
[16] Bushman, 323, 347-48.
[17]
The following verse was published in Times and Seasons (1841), 2:482:"
Or does it prove there is no time,/Because some watches will not
go?/...Or prove that Christ was not the Lord/Because that Peter cursed
and swore?/Or
Book of Mormon not His word/Because denied, by Oliver?" In
1881 both Cowdery’s law partner and his adopted daughter testified that
Cowdery had joined the Methodist Church in Tiffin, Ohio in 1841 or 1842.
In 1844, Cowdery was chosen secretary of “a meeting of Male Members of
the Methodist Protestant Church of Tiffin, Ohio.” One G. J. Keen, a lay
leader in that church, said that when joining the Methodist Church,
Cowdery “arose and addressed the audience present, admitted his error
and implored forgiveness, and said he was sorry and ashamed of his
connection with Mormonism. He continued his membership while he resided
in Tiffin and became superintendent of the Sabbath-school, and led an
exemplary life while he resided with us.” Charles Augustus Shook, The
True Origin of the Book of Mormon (Cincinnati: Standard Publishing Co.,
1914), 54-61.
[18] Randall Cluff, "Cowdery, Oliver" American National Biography Online Feb, 2000.
[19] Harris had been a Quaker, a Universalist, a Restorationist, a Baptist, a Presbyterian, and perhaps a Methodist. Ronald W. Walker, "Martin Harris: Mormonism's Early Convert," Dialog: A Journal of Mormon Thought 19 (Winter 1986):30-33).
[20] Walker, 34: "Once while reading scripture, he reportedly mistook a candle's sputtering as a sign that the devil desired to stop him."
[21]
John A. Clark letter, August 31, 1840 in EMD, 2: 271.
[22]
Walker, 34-35.
[23] Pomroy Tucker Reminiscence, 1858 in Early Mormon Documents 3: 71.
[24] Lorenzo Saunders Interview, November 12, 1884, Early Mormon Documents 2: 149.
[25]
Vogel, EMD, 2: 255.
[26] Pomeroy Tucker, Origin, Rise, and Progress of Mormonism (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1867), 71 in EMD, 3: 122.
[27] John H. Gilbert, "Memorandum," 8 September 1892, in EMD, 2: 548.
[28] Martin Harris interviews with John A. Clark, 1827 & 1828 in EMD, 2: 270; Jesse Townsend to Phineas Stiles, 24 December 1833, in EMD, 3: 22.
[29] Stephen Burnett to Lyman E. Johnson, 15 April 1838 in EMD, 2: 291.
[30]
Reuben P. Harmon statement, c. 1885, in EMD, 2: 385.
[31] Stephen Burnett to Luke S. Johnson, 15 April 1838, in Joseph Smith's Letterbook, Early Mormon Documents 2: 290-92.
[32]
Letter of Martin Harris, Sr., to Hanna B. Emerson, January 1871,
Smithfield, Utah Territory, in EMD, 2: 338. See also Richard Lloyd
Anderson, Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnesses, (Salt Lake City:
Deseret Book Company, 1981), 118. Nevertheless, some years later, even
Brigham Young referred to "witnesses of the Book of Mormon, who handled
the plates and conversed with the angels of God, [but who] were
afterward left to doubt and to disbelieve that they had ever seen an
angel." Journal of Discourses (1860), 7:164
[33]
EMD, 2: 258.
[34]
Martin Harris interview with David B. Dille, 15 September 1853 in EMD 2:
296-97.
[35] Martin Harris interview with Robert Barter, c. 1870 in EMD, 2: 390.
[36] In an
interview with ex-Mormon Anthony Metcalf, Metcalf asked him why, if he
did not believe that polygamy, baptism for the dead, or temple
endowments were part of Mormonism, he had taken the endowment when he
arrived in Salt Lake City. Harris replied "to see what was going on in
there." Martin Harris interview with Anthony Metcalf, c. 1873-74 in EMD,
2: 348.
[37] Letter of Martin Harris, Sr., to Hanna B. Emerson, January 1871, Smithfield, Utah Territory, in EMD, 2: 338. See also Richard Lloyd Anderson, Investigating the Book of Mormon Witnesses, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1981), 118.
[38]
Palmer, 180-81, 193-94, 197-99.
[39] EMD, 5: 10-11, Whitmer interview with Edward Stevenson, December 1877, EMD 5: 30-31.
[40] David Whitmer interview with Orson Pratt, September 1878, in EMD, 5: 43.
[41] Whitmer interview with John Murphy, June 1880, in EMD 5: 63.
[42]
Moyle diary, June 28, 1885 in EMD 5: 141.
[43] Michael J. Latzer, "Whitmer, David" American National Biography Online Feb, 2000.
A
PROCLAMATION
by David Whitmer
“… I wish now, standing as it were, in the very
sunset of life, and in the fear of God, once for all to make this public
statement:
That I have never at any time denied that testimony
or any part thereof, which has so long since been published with that
Book, as one of the three witnesses.
Those who know me best, well know that I have always
adhered to that testimony.
And that no man may be misled or
doubt my present views in regard to the same, I do again affirm the
truth of all of my statements, as then made and published.
He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear; it was no
delusion!
What was written is written, and
he that readeth let him understand."
DAVID WHITMER
Richmond, Mo., March 19, 1881
[45] "An Address," 27, in EMD, 5: 194.
[46]
46 In the LDS Primary lesson about the Three Witnesses, children are
urged to "Bear your testimony that the Book of Mormon is true." Another
example of this sort of thinking is illustrated in a statement about The
Three Witnesses by Quorum of the Twelve Apostles member Dallin Oaks:
"People who deny the possibility of supernatural beings may reject this
remarkable testimony, but people who are open to believe in miraculous
experiences should find it compelling. The solemn written testimony of
three witnesses to what they saw and heard—two of them simultaneously
and the third almost immediately thereafter—is entitled to great weight.
Indeed, we know that upon the testimony of one witness great miracles
have been claimed and accepted by many religious people, and in the
secular world the testimony of one witness has been deemed sufficient
for weighty penalties and judgments." Dallin H. Oaks, "The Witness:
Martin Harris," Ensign (May 1999), 35.