The Revelations of Joseph Smith — An Incredible Story Part IV - Rich Kelsey; showing changes and problems with Joseph Smith's Revelations
Home Page Mormon Series JW Article Comments Contact Donation Page
An Incredible Story Part VI —
The Revelations of Joseph Smith
Rich Kelsey

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints said this about their founding prophet:
“Joseph Smith was full of revelation. He could translate anything given to him of God. He could receive revelation without the Urim and Thummin. … [The revelations] were given to him by the inspiration of Almighty God.’” (Millennial Star, 12 Oct. 1891, p. 642)
Millions of faithful Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) trust that Smith’s revelations are the word of God. In this study we examine some of these revelations to determine if they actually did come from God; or, if perhaps Smith was the real author? Let’s begin with a revelation which led Martin Harris to sign a prepared statement insisting that he had seen the gold plates:
The Doctrine
and Covenants
Section 5
Revelation given through Joseph Smith the Prophet, at Harmony, Pennsylvania,
March 1829, at the request of Martin Harris (see
History of the Church, 1:28–31).
1—10, This generation will receive the Lord’s word through Joseph Smith… Martin Harris may repent and be one of the witnesses...
Verse (1): Behold, I say unto you, that as my servant Martin Harris has desired a witness at my hand, that you, my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., have got the plates of which you have testified and borne record that you have received of me;
Verse (2): And now, behold, this shall you say unto him—he who spake unto you, said unto you: I, the Lord, am God, and have given these things unto you, my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., and have commanded you that you should stand as a witness of these things;
...
Verse (26): And I the
Lord command him, my servant Martin Harris, that he shall
say no more unto them concerning these things, except he shall say:
I have seen them, [the
plates] and they have been shown unto me by
the power of God; and
these are the words which he shall say.
Verse (27): But if he deny this he will break the covenant which he has before covenanted with me, and behold, he is condemned.”
1
God supposedly said,
"...my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., have got the plates of which you have testified..."
Yet, something seems wrong with this dialog! Doesn't it only makes sense that if Joseph had the plates, then he could have shown them to Martin without needing,
"the power of God."
Who was really speaking:
● God?
or,
● Joseph Smith?
One thing is certain: someone was putting pressure on Martin Harris do exactly what came out of Smith's mouth.
It doesn't help matters that Martin publicly stated,
"...that he never saw the plates with his natural eyes only in vision or imagination, neither [did] Oliver nor David” (Stephen Burnett letter to Lyman E. Johnson dated April 15, 1838, Joseph Smith papers, Letter book).
One reason Martin supposedly needed to repent was because he was telling people that he did not see the plates with his natural eyes. Therefore, this revelation could have been Smith's attempt to silence Martin.
Harris is one of the Book of Mormon's "Three Witnesses." Mormon missionaries use his testimony to win over potential converts. Yet, history records that Smith did not allow Martin to see the plates until after they had been taken to heaven by an angel, and even after Martin saw the plates in the hands of an angel, at times, Martin struggled with the idea that he had really seen the plates. Martin eventually left the Church; on this subject, it is written:
“…a few others who acted as lackies, such as Martin Harris… are so far beneath contempt that a notice of them would be too great a sacrifice for a gentleman to make… no sooner were they excluded from the fellowship of the church and gave loose to all kind of abominations, swearing, lying, cheating, swindling, drinking with every species of debauchery…” (Elders’ Journal of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, August 1838, Vol. 4, p. 59. "edited by Joseph Smith")
Martin's testimony seems weak. And, his credibility as a witness is certainly lacking. People don't usually turn into liars, cheaters, and swindlers, overnight!
Also, LDS scholar, Wayne Cutler Gunnell, noted in his thesis written at Brigham Young University that that on December 31, 1844 Phineas H. Young who was Brigham Young's brother, and other leaders of the Kirtland organization wrote a letter to Brigham Young in which they spelled out:
“Martin Harris is a firm believer in Shakerism, says his
testimony is greater than it was of the Book of Mormon.” (Martin Harris -
Witness and Benefactor to the Book of Mormon, 1955, p. 52 /
Joseph Smith History, 31 Dec 1844, p. 3.)
This is the same Martin Harris which supposedly God, speaking through Joseph Smith, had earlier called,
“…a wicked man. Who has set at naught the counsels of God, and has broken the most sacred promises which were made before God, and has depended upon his own judgment and boasted in his own wisdom.” (D&C 3:12-13)
2
Then, in 1846, Martin Harris went on a mission to England as a member of the LDS splinter-group led by James J. Strang; who claimed to be the true successor to Joseph Smith. Shortly after Harris arrived in Liverpool, the LDS publication: Latter-Day Saints' Millennial Star, said this about him:
"One of the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, yielded to the spirit and temptation of the devil a number of years ago—turned against Joseph Smith and became his bitter enemy. He was filled with the rage and madness of a demon. One day he would be one thing, and another day another thing. He soon became partially deranged or shattered, as many believed, flying from one thing to another....
In one of his fits of monomania, he
went and joined the 'Shakers' or followers of Anna Lee. ...but since Strang has
made his entry ... Martin leaves the 'Shakers,' whom he knows to be right,...
and joins Strang.... We understand that he is appointed a mission to this
country,... if the Saints wish to know what the Lord hath said to him they may
turn to ... the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and the person there called a
'wicked man' is no other than Martin Harris ... Elder Wheelock will remember
that evil men, like Harris, out of the evil treasure of their hearts bring forth
evil things....
Just as our paper was going to press, we learned that Martin Harris, about whom
we have written in another article, had landed in Liverpool,... there was a
strangeness about him, and about one or two who came with him ...
A lying deceptive spirit attends them, and has
from the beginning.... they know that they are of their father,
the devil, who was a liar from the beginning, and abode not in the truth.
The very countenance of Harris will show to every spiritual-minded person who
sees him, that the wrath of God is upon him" (Wayne Gunnell, "Martin
Harris," p. 55. / Latter-Day Saints' Millennial Star,
vol. 8, pp.
124-28)
It is difficult to imagine God choosing Martin Harris as a witness, because that would mean God exercised poor judgment. Martin opposed the LDS Church from 1838 through 1870. Only near the end of his life did Martin re-join the Church. And, his testimonies of seeing the gold plates were hardly believable.[i] One thing is certain: the Martin Harris of LDS faithful history is a far cry from the Harris of actual history.
A Story Spun Out of Whole Cloth:
The next revelation we look into appears to be a real whooper: It involves Smith looking into a stone supposedly taken from a magical pair of ancient glasses he discovered, and placing that stone, or one of his own seer stones into a hat; then, seeing a spiritual light shine forth which spelled out a story of a conversation that the Lord had with the Apostle John:
The Doctrine
and Covenants
Section 7
Revelation given to Joseph Smith the Prophet and Oliver Cowdery, at Harmony,
Pennsylvania, April 1829, when they inquired through the Urim and Thummim as to
whether John, the beloved disciple, tarried in the flesh or had died. The
revelation is a translated version of the record made on parchment by John and
hidden up by himself (see
History of the Church, 1:35–36).
1—3, John the Beloved will live until the Lord comes…
3
Verse (1): And the Lord said unto me: John, my beloved, what desirest thou? For if you shall ask what you will, it shall be granted unto you.
Verse (2): And I said unto him: Lord, give unto me power over death, that I may live and bring souls unto thee.
Verse (3): And the Lord said unto me: Verily, verily, I say unto thee, because thou desirest this thou shalt tarry until I come in my glory, and shalt prophesy before nations, kindreds, tongues and people.
Verse (4): And for this cause the Lord said unto Peter: If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? For he desired of me that he might bring souls unto me, but thou desiredst that thou mightest speedily come unto me in my kingdom.
Verse (5): I say unto thee, Peter, this was a good desire; but my beloved has desired that he might do more, or a greater work yet among men than what he has before done.
Verse (6): Yea, he has undertaken a greater work; therefore I will make him as flaming fire and a ministering angel; he shall minister for those who shall be heirs of salvation who dwell on the earth.
Verse (7): And I will make thee to minister for him and for thy brother James; and unto you three I will give this power and the keys of this ministry until I come.
Verse (8): Verily I say unto you, ye shall both have according to your desires, for ye both joy in that which ye have desired.
Because Jerald and Sandra Tanner have done such a good job pointing out issues with this revelation, I have included the following section from their book: Changing the Revelations, The Case Against Mormonism:
This
revelation is supposed to contain a translation of a parchment written by the
Apostle John. Joseph Smith was supposed to have translated it by means of the
Urim and Thummim. When this revelation was published in the
Book of
Commandments in 1833, it contained 143 words, but when it was reprinted in
the Doctrine and Covenants in 1835, it contained 252 words. Thus 109
words had been added.
Mormon
writers are unable to explain why Joseph Smith changed this revelation. Melvin
J. Petersen made this statement:
In Chapter six of the Book of Commandments we find a revelation which was a translation from parchment upon which the Apostle John wrote his Gospel.
When the 1835 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants was published this revelation had many additions and a few changes. (Section thirty-four.) The additional words and sentences reveal more concerning John and his ministry. How Joseph Smith had this information revealed to him, by means of the Urim and Thummim, is not clear.... What part revelation played in receiving this information concerning John is not known, nor is it known as to how the translation was enacted. We do know that additions and changes were made by Joseph Smith....
Joseph Smith left nothing in his writings to indicate why he added to this
translated version... and so any plausible answers will be merely conjecture.
("A Study of the Nature of and the Significance of the Changes in the
Revelations as Found in a Comparison of the Book of Commandments and Subsequent
Editions of the Doctrine and Covenants," Master's Thesis, Brigham Young
University, 1955, typed copy, pages 154-155)
Actually, there are only three logical explanations as to why this revelation reads different in the Doctrine and Covenants than it did when printed in the Book of Commandments. First, before reprinting this revelation in the Doctrine and Covenants, Joseph Smith may have decided to falsely attribute words to the Apostle John that he did not utter. This explanation would mean that Joseph Smith was a deceiver.
4
Second, before the revelation was reprinted
the Lord may have shown Joseph Smith that he had not translated the parchment
correctly with the Urim and Thummim and that he must add in 109 words to make it
correct. This explanation would place a shadow of doubt upon Joseph Smith's
ability as a translator. Any individual who left out 109 words of a translation
would be considered a very poor translator indeed! Third, Joseph Smith may have
received the full text of the revelation to begin with but suppressed part of it
when the
Book of
Commandments was printed. Melvin J, Petersen states:
Doctor Sidney B. Sperry,... has suggested that it is possible that Joseph Smith
edited the translation in its first published form and then later wrote down the
complete translation as it is found in our present text. Whether this suggested
answers be right or wrong cannot be determined until further evidence is brought
to light upon the problem. ("A Study of the Nature of and the Significance of
the Changes in the Revelations...," typed copy, page 155)
This explanation would also make Joseph Smith a deceiver since he did not put in "the little dots which indicate that one is making deletions." Furthermore, there was no real reason to suppress 109 words from the revelation. This revelation is printed on page 18 of the Book of Commandments, and a careful examination of this page reveals that part of the page has been left blank and that there was enough room to include these words. Therefore, there would have been no reason to suppress part of the revelation. (Changing the Revelations, The Case Against Mormonism, Ch. 6, pp. 131–191 By Jerald and Sandra Tanner) [see photo] Text and photo used with permission)
The next revelation is about Martin Harris covering the cost of printing the Book of Mormon:
The Doctrine
and Covenants
Section 19
Revelation given
through Joseph Smith, at Manchester, New York, March 1830…
In his history, the Prophet introduced
it as “a commandment of God and not of man, to Martin Harris, given by him who
is Eternal”
Verse (10): For, behold, the mystery of godliness, how great is it! For, behold, I am endless, and the punishment which is given from my hand is endless punishment, for Endless is my name. Wherefore—
Verse (11): Eternal punishment is God’s punishment.
Verse (12): Endless punishment is God’s punishment.
Verse (13): Wherefore, I command you to repent, and keep the commandments which you have received by the hand of my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., in my name;
Verse (14): And it is by my almighty power that you have received them;
Verse (15): Therefore I command you to repent—repent, lest I smite you by the rod of my mouth, and by my wrath, and by my anger, and your sufferings be sore—how sore you know not, how exquisite you know not, yea, how hard to bear you know not
…
Verse (26): And again, I command thee that thou shalt not covet thine own property, but impart it freely to the printing of the Book of Mormon, which contains the truth and the word of God—
5
Verse (32): Behold, this is a great and the last commandment which I shall give unto you concerning this matter; for this shall suffice for thy daily walk, even unto the end of thy life.
Verse (33): And misery thou shalt receive if thou wilt slight these counsels, yea, even the destruction of thyself and property.
Verse (34): Impart a portion of thy property, yea, even part of thy lands…
Verse (35): Pay the debt thou hast contracted with the printer. Release thyself from bondage.
Is it possible that God was not the one threatening Martin Harris with endless punishment if Harris did not pay the entire cost of printing the Book of Mormon? There certainly appear to be some contradictions in God’s supposed words.
For example:
· In verses (10) and (13), God is allegedly speaking because God uses the term “I.” However, in verses (11) and (12) the perspective is changed; now someone is speaking about God’s punishment; in those verses apparently God is not the one speaking, yet, the dialog continues unbroken!
· Then, in verse (26), once more supposedly God starts off speaking in the first person by using the word, “I,” then in mid-sentence God changes His perspective by talking about “the word of God.” It appears that someone could not keep their story straight.
· This revelation resembles another revelation in which supposedly God commanded Martin Harris to devote “his moneys for the proclaiming of … [God’s] words, according as my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., shall direct” (Doctrine and Covenants 104:26).
· And, the revelation appears to be self serving, because pressure was being put on Martin Harris to pay the entire cost of the printing, even though Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum had originally agreed to pay half of it. (Please see Book of Mormon Printing Arrangements)
The
Joseph Smith Translation:
In section 73 from the Doctrine and Covenants we find the
words:
“Now, verily I say unto you my servants, Joseph Smith, Jun.,
and Sidney Rigdon, saith the Lord, it is expedient to translate again; …it is
expedient to continue the work of translation until it be finished.”
What Smith and Rigdon were working on is called the Joseph
Smith Translation of the Bible.
“Beginning in June 1830, Joseph
Smith began a careful reading of the Bible to revise and make corrections in
accordance with the inspiration he would receive…
In a process that took about three years, the Prophet made changes,
additions, and corrections as were given him by divine inspiration while he
filled his calling to provide a more correct translation for the Church…”
6
Genesis: Chapter 1, JST / Moses 2:
Verse (1): And it came to pass, that the Lord spake unto Moses,
saying, Behold, I reveal unto you concerning this heaven and this earth; write
the words which I speak.
Verse (2): I am the Beginning and the End; the Almighty God. By mine
Only Begotten I created these things.
Verse (3): Yea, in the beginning I created the heaven, and the earth
upon which thou standest.
Genesis: Chapter 1, KJV:
Verse (1): In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Verse (2): And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was
upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters.
Verse (3): And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
It may only seem appropriate for the Joseph Smith Translation
to begin with the words,
"And it came to pass...
That phrase is used throughout the Book
of Mormon.
But one might wonder: Is there any textual evidence
available to support a different beginning to Genesis 1 than what is found in
Bibles penned before the Joseph Smith Translation?
No.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon)
explains that Smith’s Translation of the Bible is more revelation than literal
translation:
"The Lord inspired the Prophet Joseph Smith to restore truths
to the Bible text that had become lost or changed since the original words were
written. These restored truths clarified doctrine and improved scriptural
understanding... Because the Lord revealed to Joseph certain truths that the
original authors had once recorded, the Joseph Smith Translation is unlike any
other Bible translation in the world. In this sense, the word translation is
used in a broader and different way than usual, for Joseph’s translation was
more revelation than literal translation from one language into another."
(LDS.org, The Scriptures Internet Edition: introduction to Joseph Smith
Translation)
The Book of Moses:
Joseph Smith added an introductory revelation[ii] to Genesis. He then added to the existing Genesis text.[iii] Three thousand, four hundred, and twenty two words were added to Genesis up until chapter 6:13 which is where the Book of Moses ends. That almost exactly doubles the conventional word-count of Genesis up to that point in the King James Version. This supposed restored work of Moses is published in the Pearl of Great Price; which is LDS scripture.[iv]
7
“Selections from the Book of Moses in the Pearl of Great
Price is the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) of Genesis 1:1-6:13, the beginning
pages of the New Translation. The material in it was revealed [to Joseph Smith]
between June 1830 and February 1831. In some ways, the Book of Moses can be
considered the most significant part of the JST, because it has contributed more
distinctive Latter-day Saint doctrine than any other part of that work. It has
stood since the beginning of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as
one of the doctrinal cornerstones of the Restoration and as an enduring
testimony to the divinely inspired work of Joseph Smith.” (History of the Book
of Moses - Kent P. Jackson, The Book of Moses and the Joseph Smith Translation
Manuscripts (Provo: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2005),
p. 1-52)
Envision Moses from Old Testament fame,
writing an introduction to Genesis, only to have dishonest scribes remove
that work from
the biblical canon. Envision corrupt scribes also going through the
remaining chapters of Genesis and removing several hundred more words which
Moses had written.
Then, envision God raising up a seer in
the latter days; who, under divine inspiration, restored Moses’ lost words to
their ancient purity:
“And that seer will I bless, and they that seek to destroy
him shall be confounded; for this promise I give unto you; for I will remember
you from generation to generation; and his name
shall be called Joseph, and it shall be after the name of his father; and
he shall be like unto you; [Moses]
for the thing which the Lord shall bring forth by his hand shall bring my people
unto salvation.” (Genesis 50:33)
Out of all the bibles in the world,
only the Joseph Smith Translation contains this prophecy.
Other versions of the Bible end at Genesis 50:26.
The JST contains an extra twelve verses ending at
Genesis 50:38.
The “seer” mentioned in the text is referring to
Smith himself.
His father’s name was also Joseph; and, there are
other details in this prophecy that fit with an earlier supposed lost prophecy
about Smith:
“And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words
as naught and take many of them from the book which thou shalt write, behold, I
will raise up another like unto thee; and they shall be had again among the
children of men—among as many as shall believe.” (Moses 1:41)
God is supposedly speaking to Moses about a book Moses shall write, and how men will take many words away from it; yet God will raise up another like unto Moses and the missing words shall be
“had again.”
When Joseph Smith uttered Moses’
lost words to his scribe, and then realized that he was the very person
spoken of in the prophecy, this was possibly one of the greatest events in the
history of religion since the beginning of the gospel age!
Or, perhaps it was a bold faced lie of grandiose
proportions?
8
Details from the Prophecies:
1.
Words
shall be taken from God’s record which Moses is yet to write.
2.
The
lost words shall be restored by Joseph Smith.
3.
Joseph
Smith is compared to Moses.
4.
The
thing which the Lord shall bring forth by his hand shall bring God’s people unto
salvation.
Obviously, the concept of God comparing Smith to Moses would
be more believable if it did not come from Smith’s own mouth. One glaring
thing about these prophecies is the manner of speech which God supposedly used:
"…and they [the lost words] shall be had again..."
In that verse God sounds just like the angel Moroni:
“…my name [Joseph Smith] should be had for good and evil…”
(Joseph Smith History, Vol. 1, 1:33)
Why is it that God, angels, and prophets from Mormon
scripture, all use the same manner of speech[v]
as Joseph Smith?
Also,
According to the prophecy in Moses 1:41, Moses had yet to write the book.
So, why would God say 18 verses earlier:
“And now of
this thing Moses bore record; but because of wickedness it is not had among the
children of men.” (Moses 1:23)
Obviously, the words of Moses could not have been
lost before they were written! The time key in Moses 1 is established in verse
(41) where God
supposedly speaks to Moses about a book he shall write:
“And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words
as naught and take many of them from the book which you shall write,…” (Moses
1:41)
It sounds like someone could not keep
their story straight!
Who might that be?
Was it:
1. God.
2.
Moses
Or,
3. Joseph Smith.[vi]
Anachronisms found in the Book of Moses will answer this
question! Several words and terms which Smith added
to Genesis are anachronistic.
An anachronism[vii] is an error in chronology. An example of an anachronism in film would be use of modern helicopters instead of period-correct helicopters while recreating war scenes.
9
Using helicopters made in the 1990s for a war that ended
in 1975 such as the Vietnam War is a dead giveaway that this segment of the film
is not actual; or, even realistic footage.
Anachronisms in books are similar; if a
character in a book from the 1970s is using words and terminologies from the
1990s then we know that those parts of the book were not taken from any actual
quotes of the character in question.
The Book of Moses has anachronisms, and they are
obvious!
Agents unto themselves:
"And it is given unto them to know good from evil; wherefore
they are agents unto themselves…" (Book of Moses 6:56)
Neither the word “agents” nor the phrase
“agents unto
themselves” is found in the writings of Moses from Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,
Numbers, or Deuteronomy, nor has the term been used by any other prophet, king,
or apostle, in the entire Bible.
There is no historical evidence that God’s people
living during or before the time of Christ ever used this term.[viii]
It’s worth mentioning that in Smith’s revelations, as found
in the Doctrine and Covenants, the phrase agents unto themselves is used three
times:
● "And it must needs be that the devil should tempt
the children of men, or they could not be agents
unto themselves…" (D&C 29:39)
● "For the power is in them, wherein they are
agents unto
themselves…" (D&C 58:28)
● "… I prepared all things, and have given unto the
children of men to be agents unto themselves." (D&C 104:17)
The phrase, "agents unto themselves"
is an anachronism; it is
out of place chronologically with Moses’ day.
Agency of man:
"Wherefore, because that Satan rebelled against me, and sought
to destroy the agency of man, which I, the Lord God, had given him…" (Moses 4:3)
Neither the word “agency” nor the phrase “agency of man” is found in the Bible.
“Agency of man” is a doctrinal term;[ix]
it expresses man’s free will, or, God-given ability to choose.
This term is and was often used by scholars
discussing a doctrine called predestination, also known as Calvinism.
This phrase, "agency of man," is found in the Doctrine and
Covenants:
"Behold, here is the agency of man, and here is the
condemnation of man…" (D&C 93:31)
What
are the odds that a doctrinal term[x]
which was popular in Smith’s day would be among Moses’ lost record?
10
Original guilt:
"Hence came the saying abroad among the people, that the Son
of God hath atoned for original guilt, wherein the sins of the parents cannot be
answered upon the heads of the children…" (Book of Moses 6:54)
The term “original guilt” is never used
once in the Bible, but it was a popular term in Smith’s day.
“Original guilt” also known as “original sin” is a
doctrinal term which Smith and his contemporaries were familiar with.
The Book of Moses is full of explanations about controversial
doctrines that were the subject of debate in Smith’s day, just like the Book of
Mormon:
“This prophet Smith, through his stone
spectacles, wrote on the plates of Nephi, in his book of Mormon, every error and
almost every truth discussed in New York for the last ten years.
He decided all the great controversies… the fall of
man, the atonement…even the question of free masonry…” (Millennial Harbinger,
Vol. II, February 1831, p. 85)
Secret Combination:
"For, from the days of Cain, there was a
secret combination,
and their works were in the dark…" (Book of Moses 5:51)
Neither the term,
“secret combination;” nor the word
“combination” can be found in the Bible.
Yet, in the Book of Mormon we find the plural
version of this term — secret combinations — used thirteen times.[xi]
Also, as the Book of Moses was being written, Joseph Smith
received a revelation containing this term:
"And even now, let him that goeth to the
east teach them that shall be converted to flee to the west, and this in
consequence of that which is coming on the earth, and of
secret combinations."
(February 9, 1831, D&C 42:64)
This was a popular term in Smith’s day, to describe the
practices of Freemasonry:
"…at the time of the Book of Mormon's
publication the term 'secret combinations'
was used almost exclusively to refer
to Freemasonry."
(Mormonism's Anti-Masonick Bible, p. 18)
It’s worth mentioning that Joseph Smith’s father Joseph Smith Sr. was a practicing member of a Masonic lodge in upstate New York. On May 7th 1818 when the young Smith was about to turn thirteen his father rose to the degree of Master Mason.[xii]
The Prophet himself sought[xiii]
and achieved[xiv] the title of Master Mason[xv]
11
Master Mahan:
The non-biblical title “Master Mahan” is found twice in the Book of Moses:
● "And Cain said: Truly I am Mahan, the master of this
great secret, that I may murder and get gain. Wherefore Cain was called
Master
Mahan…" (Book of Moses 5:31)
● "For Lamech having entered into a covenant with
Satan, after the manner of Cain, wherein he became
Master Mahan, master of that
great secret…" (Book of Moses 5:49)
In both passages, this title is connected to the knowledge
of a great secret.
Freemasonry contains a “great secret.”[xvi]
The similarities between the titles and privileges
of Master Mahan from the Book of Moses, and that of
Master Mason
from
Freemasonry are noteworthy.
Particle:
"And it came to pass, as the voice was still speaking, Moses
cast his eyes and beheld the earth, yea, even all of it; and there was not a
particle of it which he did not behold…" (Book of Moses 1:27)
The term “particle” is not found in the
Bible; yet this word is found in the Book of Mormon:
"But behold, if ye will awake and arouse your faculties, even
to an experiment upon my words, and exercise a particle of faith…" (Alma 32:27)
It’s noteworthy that in the writing style of the Book of
Mormon, and in Moses’ supposed lost words, the same phrase
“a particle of”
is
found.
It’s also worth mentioning that in Alma 32:27, from the
Book of Mormon, where the same phrase
Obviously, words like “faculties,” and
“experiment,” also seem out of place among supposed ancient writings.
Particles:
"And were it possible that man could number the
particles of
the earth, yea…" (Book of Moses 7:30)
The plural definition of the word,
“particle,” while in use in Smith’s day cannot be found in the Bible.
12
Unalterable:
"And he sent forth an unalterable decree, that a remnant of
his seed should always be found among all nations, while the earth should stand;"
(Moses 7:52)
Not only is the word
“unalterable”
outside of Moses’ known vocabulary; it cannot be found in the entire Bible.
However, Joseph Smith was familiar with this term.
Smith dictated the term
“unalterable” to his scribe
while translating the Book of Mormon:
"I had not ought to harrow up in my
desires… decrees which are unalterable…"
(Alma 29:4, 1830 Book of Mormon)
Obviously, the expression,
“I had not ought to harrow up in my desires…”
does not sound like
language[xviii]
one would expect from a holy man living in 90 BC.
Meridian of time:
● "…even him whom he declared should come in the
meridian of time, who was prepared from before the foundation of the world."
(Moses 5:57)
● "…the Son of Man, even Jesus Christ, a righteous
Judge, who shall come in the meridian of time." (Moses 6:57)
●
"…through the blood of mine
Only Begotten, who shall come in the meridian of time."
(Moses 6:62)
● "And the Lord said: It shall be in the
meridian
of time, in the days of wickedness and vengeance." (Moses 7:46)
It is worth mentioning that in other supposed revelations given
through the Prophet Joseph Smith this same phrase is found:
● "…after he came in the
meridian of time…" (D&C,
20:26)
● "The same which came in
the meridian of time unto mine own, and mine own received me not;" (D&C, 39:3)
The term Meridian can point to the midpoint in a day, high
noon, when the sun is at the top of the earth’s circle of rotation.
The
word[xix]
stems from Latin meridianus and also from Middle French meridien where meri
refers to center; in the way of a midpoint, and dien from the Latin word for
“day.”
“The
meridian of time has been defined by one LDS apostle as
‘the middle or high point of that portion of eternity which is considered to be
mortal time’" (MD, 1966, p. 486).
13
While
found four times in the Book of Moses; neither the phrase
“meridian of time,”
nor the word “meridian” can be found in the entire Bible.[xx]
What is the likelihood that Moses used
this doctrinal term in his original writings, only to have all four of those
passages deleted by dishonest scribes?
Are those odds worth gambling on?
That is what every person who places their faith in
Joseph Smith is doing!
They are risking their spiritual destiny on
impossible odds.
Anachronisms within the Book of Moses
are solid-irrefutable-proof that Moses did not write the Book of Moses.
Yet, Joseph Smith claimed he did!
Joseph Smith's New Translation[xxi]
of Genesis is nothing more than a poorly
crafted forgery, dictated by Joseph Smith himself, then falsely attributed to an
ancient holy man.
Conclusion:
One would think that Smith’s version of the Bible should forever settle the question found in the LDS articles of faith, section # 8:
“We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly…” (History of the Church, Vol. 4, pp. 535–41)
Because, now the LDS Church has a Bible that was translated correctly; right?
Wrong!
Very few members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints own a copy. And, missionaries still use the King James Version in the mission field.
Why?
In reality: The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible has never been fully accepted by the LDS Church. This speaks volumes as to what the Church actually thinks of Joseph Smith's ability to receive revelation and/or translate God's holy word!
For more information on this subject please see (Book of Moses Changes)
Would you like to see this article published in Spanish, or another common
non-English language? If you care enough about this message to volunteer to
translate this work, please contact Rich Kelsey: globalevangelism@msn.com
Endnotes:
■ “I will tell you a wonderful thing that happened after Joseph had found the plates. Three of us took some tools to go to the hill and hunt for some more boxes of gold or something, and indeed we found a stone box. We got quite excited about it and dug quite carefully around it and we were ready to take it up, but behold by some unseen power the box slipped back into the hill. We stood there and looked at it and one of us took a crowbar and tried to drive it through the lid and hold it but the bar glanced off and broke off one corner of the box. Sometime that box will be found and you will see the corner broken off and then you will know I have told the truth again.” (Martin’s death-bed statement - signed as witnesses Clarkston, Utah, July, 1875 - John Godfrey, Ole A. Jensen and James Keep)
■ “I never saw the golden plates, only in a visionary or entranced state. I wrote a great deal of the Book of Mormon myself, as Joseph Smith translated or spelled the words out in English. Sometimes the plates would be on a table in the room in which Smith did the translating, covered over with a cloth. I was told by Smith that God would strike him dead if he attempted to look at them, and I believed it.” (Anthony Metcalf, Ten Years Before the Mast, n.d., microfilm copy, p. 70–71; quoted in Dale Morgan, Dale Morgan on Early Mormonism: Correspondence and a New History, Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1986).
■ “Harris was told that it would arouse the most terrible divine displeasure, if he should attempt to draw near the sacred chest, or look at Smith while engaged in the work of decyphering (sic) the mysterious characters.” (1827 — Account of Martin Harris given to the Rev. John A. Clark, as related in his 1842 book Gleanings by the Way, W.J. & J.K. Simon, pp. 222ff). [Microfilm copy]
■ John H. Gilbert, who participated in printing of the Book of Mormon. said: "Martin was something of a prophet: He frequently said that 'Jackson would be the last president that we would have; and that all persons who did not embrace Mormonism in two years would be stricken off the face of the earth.' He said that 'Palmyra was to be the New Jerusalem, and that her streets were to be paved with gold.' Martin was in the office when I finished setting up the testimony of the three witnesses, (Harris — Cowdery and Whitmer) I said to him, 'Martin, did you see those plates with your naked eyes?' Martin looked down for an instant, raise his eyes up, and said, 'No, I saw them with a spiritual eye.'" (Wilford C. Wood, Joseph Smith Begins His Work, Vol. 1, 1958, introduction. This is a photomechanical reprint of the first edition [1830] of the Book of Mormon. It also contains biographical and historical information relating to the Book of Mormon.)
[ii] "The first document [Moses I] in the Old Testament manuscripts (now Doctrine and Covenants Section 22) was not incorporated as part of the biblical text. This, however, has appeared in all editions as an introductory revelation." (Forward to the Inspired Version on-line)
[iii]
“The
Book of Moses
is part of the scriptural canon of Mormonism dictated by founder Joseph
Smith Jr. It is an amalgamation of the 'Vision of Moses,' which Smith
dictated in June 1830, the 'Book of Enoch,' dictated December 1830, and
material deriving from Smith’s of the Book of Genesis in early 1831
which incorporated the Book of Enoch and treated the Vision of Moses as
a prologue to the Bible. Its full title is
Selections
from the Book of Moses,
implying that it is not a complete work. The vision of Moses and the
Book of Enoch works were originally published separately by The Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) in 1851…” (Wikipedia –
Book of Moses)
[iv] (The 1851 Pearl of Great Price)
In 1851 Elder Franklin D. Richards created what we now call the Book of Moses by publishing Genesis excerpts from the Joseph Smith Translation in his British Mission pamphlet, the Pearl of Great Price. (Kent P. Jackson, The Book of Moses and the Joseph Smith Translation Manuscripts (Provo: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2005), p. 1)
[v] “The first edition of the Book of Mormon carried numerous sentences with a plural subject and singular verb, and vice versa; it sometimes placed an idiomatic “a” before a participle (“a marching”) or an idiomatic “for” before an infinitive (“for to destroy them”); it regularly used “which” for the personal “who.” Such language clearly originated with the Prophet as he dictated, not with the secretary” (Ensign, September 1977, “By the Gift and Power of God,” Richard Lloyd Anderson).
[vi] “…Joseph’s
translation was more
revelation than literal translation from one language into
another.” (On-line Introduction to the Joseph Smith Translation @
scriptureslds.org)
[vii] Anach·ro·nism:
1: an error in chronology ; especially : a
chronological misplacing of persons, events, objects, or customs in
regard to each other
2: a person or a thing that is chronologically out
of place; especially: one from a former age that is incongruous in the
present
3: the state or condition of being chronologically
out of place
(Merriam — Webster Dictionary, on-line, 2009)
[viii]
Agent:
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Medieval Latin
agent-, agens, from Latin, present participle of agere to drive, lead,
act, do; akin to Old Norse aka to travel in a vehicle, Greek agein to
drive, lead
Date: 15th century
(Merriam – Webster Dictionary, on-line, 2009).
[ix]
“Agency is the ability God gives people to choose for themselves. This
makes each person responsible for the decisions he or she makes…”
(Mormonwicki.com/Agency, 2009)
[x] “Calvinists deny that their scheme is a form of determinism and
instead uphold the free agency
and moral responsibility of the individual. They do, however, hold that
the will is in bondage to sin and therefore unable to actualize its true
freedom. Hence, an individual cannot choose to trust God because their
will is enslaved to evil…” (Predestination, Wikipedia, 2009)
[xi ] SECRET COMBINATIONS:
● For behold, they murdered all the
prophets of the Lord who came among them to declare unto them concerning
their iniquities; and the blood of those whom they murdered did cry unto
the Lord their God for vengeance upon those who were their murderers;
and thus the judgments of God did come upon these workers of darkness
and secret combinations.
(Alma, 37:30)
● Yea, and cursed be the land forever
and ever unto those workers of darkness and
secret combinations,
even unto destruction, except they repent before they are fully ripe.
(Alma, 37:31)
● For the Lord worketh not in
secret combinations, neither doth he will that man should
shed blood, but in all things hath forbidden it, from the beginning of
man. (Ether, 8:19)
● And whatsoever nation shall uphold
such secret combinations,
to get power and gain, until they shall spread over the nation, behold,
they shall be destroyed; for the Lord will not suffer that the blood of
his saints, which shall be shed by them, shall always cry unto him from
the ground for vengeance upon them and yet he avenge them not.
(Ether, 8:22)
● Now the brother of
Shared, whose name was Gilead, also received great strength to his army,
because of secret combinations.
(Ether 14:10)
● And it came to pass
that one of the secret
combinations murdered him in a secret pass, and obtained unto
himself the kingdom; and his name was Lib; and Lib was a man of great
stature, more than any other man among all the people. (Ether 14:10)
● And our spirits
must have become like unto him, and we become devils, angels to a devil,
to be shut out from the presence of our God, and to remain with the
father of lies, in misery, like unto himself; yea, to that being who
beguiled our first parents, who transformeth himself nigh unto an angel
of light, and stirreth up the children of men unto
secret combinations of
murder and all manner of secret works of darkness.
(2 Nephi, 9:9)
● And there are also
secret combinations,
even as in times of old, according to the combinations of the devil, for
he is the founder of all these things; yea, the founder of murder, and
works of darkness; yea, and he leadeth them by the neck with a flaxen
cord, until he bindeth them with his strong cords forever.
(2 Nephi, 26:22)
● And it came to pass
in the forty and ninth year of the reign of the judges, there was
continual peace established in the land, all save it were the
secret combinations
which Gadianton the robber had established in the more settled parts of
the land, which at that time were not known unto those who were at the
head of government; therefore they were not destroyed out of the land. (Helaman.
3:23)
● May the
Lord preserve his people in righteousness and in holiness of heart, that
they may cause to be felled to the earth all who shall seek to slay them
because of power and secret
combinations, even as this man hath been felled to the earth. (3
Nephi, 4:29)
● And it
shall come in a day when the blood of saints shall cry unto the Lord,
because of secret combinations
and the works of darkness. (Mormon, 8:27)
● And now I, Moroni,
proceed with my record. Therefore, behold, it came to pass that because
of the secret combinations
of Akish and his friends, behold, they did overthrow the kingdom of
Omer. (Ether 9:1)
● Wherefore, it came
to pass that in the first year that Ether dwelt in the cavity of a rock,
there were many people who were slain by the sword of those
secret combinations,
fighting against Coriantumr that they might obtain the kingdom. (Ether
13:18)
[xii]
“[The Joseph Smith family] was a Masonic family which lived by and
practiced the estimable and admirable tenets of Freemasonry. The father,
Joseph Smith, Sr., was a documented member in upstate New York. He was
raised to the degree of Master Mason on May 7, 1818 in Ontario Lodge No.
23 of Canandaigua, New York. An older son, Hyrum Smith, was a member of
Mount Moriah Lodge No. 112, Palmyra New York.” (The Mormon Church and
Freemasonry (2001), Terry Chateau)
[xiii]
“I officiated as grand chaplain at the installation of the Nauvoo Lodge
of Free Masons, at the Grove near the Temple. Grand Master Jonas, of
Columbus, being present, a large number of people assembled on the
occasion. The day was exceedingly fine; all things were done in order,
and universal satisfaction was manifested. In the evening I received the
first degree in Freemasonry in the Nauvoo Lodge, assembled in my general
business office.” (History of the Church, by Joseph Smith, Deseret Book,
1978, Vol.4, Ch.32, p.550-1)
[xiv] “Smith was
initiated as an Entered Apprentice Mason at the Nauvoo lodge on March
15, 1842. The next day, he was raised to the degree of Master Mason; the
usual month-long wait between degrees was waived by the Grand Master of
Illinois,” (Bushman 2005,p. 449).
[xv] "...with uplifted hands they gave such signs of distress as would have commanded the interposition and benevolence of Savages or Pagans. They were both Masons in good standing. Ye brethren of 'the mystic tie' what think ye! Where is our good Master Joseph and Hyrum? Is there a pagan, heathen, or savage nation on the globe that would not be moved on this great occasion, as the trees of the forest are moved by a mighty wind? Joseph's last exclamation was 'O LORD MY GOD!' " (Times and Seasons, Vol. 5, p. 585)
"When the enemy surrounded the jail, rushed up the stairway, and killed
Hyrum Smith, Joseph stood at the open window, his martyr-cry being these
words, 'O Lord My God!' This was not the beginning of a prayer, because
Joseph Smith did not pray in that manner. This brave, young man who knew
that death was near, started to repeat the distress signal of the
Masons, expecting thereby to gain the protection its members are pledged
to give a brother in distress.” (Mormonism and Masonry, by Mormon
writer: E. Cecil McGavin, p. 17)
[xvi] …
the great secret of the
mediaeval Masons consisted
in the application of the principles of Geometry
to the art of building
by methods known only to themselves, and which
they developed
in the Gothic style of architecture which they
invented. This secret
perished with the dissolution of the Operative
Fraternity, or by its
transmission into the Speculative Association.
Yet this Speculative Association, the Free and
Accepted Masons
of the present day, have retained the memory of
their descent
from these Operative Masons of the Middle Ages by
a sacred preservation
in their ritual of a reference to Geometry as the
" fifth
and noblest of the sciences and the one on which
the superstructure
of Masonry is founded."
The retention in the ritual of the letter G, the
earliest and the
most extensively propagated of all the symbols of
Speculative Masonry,
is an ever-present and a loudly speaking testimony
in every
lodge that the brethren there congregated have not
forgotten that
the great
secret of their predecessors was a geometrical one.
Indeed, if there were no other proof that the
mediaeval Freemasons
did all their work according to certain principles
of Geometry,
the method of applying which was known only to
themselves,
and that therefore the science of Geometry was to
them a most important
and indispensable part of their Craft…
(The History of Freemasonry by Albert Mackey, William Singleton; 1898, p.763)·
●
“Wherefore, I, Nephi, did exhort them to give heed unto the word of the
Lord; yea, I did exhort them with all the energies of my soul, and with
all the faculty which I
possessed, that they would give heed to the word of God and remember to
keep his commandments always in all things.” (1 Nephi 15:25)
● “O my brethren, hearken unto my words; arouse the
faculties of your
souls; shake yourselves that ye may awake from the slumber of death; and
loose yourselves from the pains of hell that ye may not become angels to
the devil, to be cast into that lake of fire and brimstone which is the
second death.” (Jacob 3:11)
● “Wherefore, with the help of these, king Benjamin, by laboring
with all the might of his body and the
faculty of his whole
soul, and also the prophets, did once more establish peace in the land.”
(Words of Mormon 1:18)
● “And even I myself have labored with all the power and
faculties which I
have possessed, to teach you the commandments of God, and to establish
peace throughout the land, that there should be no wars nor contentions,
no stealing, nor plundering, nor murdering, nor any manner of iniquity;”
(Mosiah 29:14)
● “But behold, if ye will
awake and arouse your faculties, even to an
experiment upon my words, and exercise
a particle of faith, yea, even if ye can no more than desire to believe,
let this desire work in you, even until ye believe in a manner that ye
can give place for a portion of my words.” (Alma 32:27)
[xviii] This text now reads: “I ought not to harrow up in my desires…” (Alma 29:4, 1837 edition) By removing the word “had” and changing “not ought” to “ought not” Alma now sounds a little less like someone from the 19th Century.
[xix]
(Webster’s New Dictionary of the English Language, 2002 edition,
author’s paraphrase).
[xx] “The meridian of time has been defined
by one LDS apostle as "the middle or high point of that portion of
eternity which is considered to be mortal time" (MD, 1966, p.
486). It is the dispensation in which Jesus Christ lived in mortality.
The term does not occur in the
Bible, but is found in the
Doctrine and Covenants (20:26; 39:3) and in the
Book of Moses 5:57; 6:57;
6:62; 7:46).
The word "meridian" suggests the middle. According to Old Testament genealogies, from the Fall of Adam to the time of Jesus Christ was approximately 4,000 years. It has been nearly 2,000 years since Jesus' birth. The millennial reign will commence "in the beginning of the seventh thousand years" (D&C 77:12). After the Millennium there will be a "little season," the exact length of which is not revealed, but it could be several hundred years. In the context of these events, the Lord's mortal ministry took place near the meridian, or middle, of mortal time (DS 1:81)… MARSHALL T. BURTON” (BYU Studies, also found in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1992 edition)
[xxi]
(Joseph Smith referred to
it, the ‘New Translation.’ See Doctrine and
Covenants 124:89; Times and Seasons 1, no. 9 (July 1840): 140.
See also Joseph Smith, History of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints, ed. B. H. Roberts, 2d ed. rev. (Salt Lake City:
Deseret Book, 1957), 1:341, 365; 4:164.)